Відео

buuu, tu video es como las weas, ERES UN PÉSIMO, PÉSIMO PROFESOR Y PEOR, PEOR INVESTIGADOR, el tema que abordaste es TREMENDAMENTE IMPORTANTE para la historia de Chile Y LO CONTASTE COMO UNA ANECDOTA DE NOVATOS, LLENA DE IMPRECISIONES, LLENA DE VACIOS, Y COMPLETAMENTE FALTA DE EXACTITUD HISTORICA, menos mal que nunca seré tu alumno, y si lo hubiese sido me habria cambiado de colegio proximo video enseña historia de Holanda, quizas ahi seas mejor profesor

So much German speaking land lost. Russians have plenty. It really is a shame.

It's very sad how wrong this guy is historically speaking.. I just couldnt finish the video

I am a Peruvian American doctor in Texas who likes this story of the Pacific War. I agree that Peru lacked cohesion as a nation to face this war. Despite this great historical wound, politicians and leaders have not acted as they should. Thanks for a good summary of this war.

Autocracy, Orthodoxy , Nationality! I find it interesting in presentation and historical analysis these things are seen as bad or as our presenter noted " early version of Facism " The indigenous peoples of these lands like in this case Russia have every right to be whatever they want! These nationals blaming Jews for their problems yet not mentioning what the problems are? One was they blamed these leftist radical Talmudic style groups for the assination of Alexander II.....These Jews that perpetrated the worst crimes of the last 100 years and the reason they got away with it is the matter of the fact that the so called " Christian " neighbors of the Russian Empire were in on the greatest theft of all time! Even the fall of the Soviet Union these Oligarchs ✡️very unethically robbed the nation of its recourses!! I would love to see an investigation and which nations benefited to most 🪙💸💰💵whilst Mother Russia was under the evil comtrol of Communism!

Absolute nonsense and propaganda

The Ottomans never called it Palaestine. The entire empire (except Egypt) had no boundaries and,no states or provinces. The empire was arbitrarily divided into administrative areas called variously Beyliks or Valyets. The areas were created solely by the Sultan, who appointed administrators and their area of control, whenever it suited him. The administrators (Bey or Sanjak Bey if he was the equivalent of a general) were moved around regularly by the Sultan to ensure that none of them got enough local power to challenge his authority. There never was a country called Palaestine, After the destruction of the second temple the Romans controlled the Levant, today Syria, Lebanon, Jordan & Israel. A large section was called Syria Palaestina, after the ancient but extinct Philistines. The Message to Judea was clear, “Don’t cause trouble, or you are next”. The PLO/PA claim to be Palaestinians, of which they falsely claim to be descendant 6:13 . The irony is that the Philistines were not Semitic, they were sea peoples that were ethnically related to the Greeks. They were like Vikings, and caused a great deal of destruction in what is now the Gaza strip and the Egyptian Nile delta. They were chased out of the Nile Delta by Ra-Mesis III (Rameses) in 1175 BCE and suffered with the Judeans under invasions from Neo-Assyrian under Tiglath Pilesser III, then Sargon II followed by his son Sennacherib. The Philistines were finally and totally wiped out by the Babylonian Nebu-chot-nezzar (Nebuchadnezzar). After WW1, the newly formed League of Nations gave France a mandate to rule what is now Syria and Lebanon, and the British were given a mandate to J“Create a homeland for the Jewish people” that was to be from the southern border of the Syrian mandate, and from the Mediterranean & Red seas to the border of a new country created in Mesopotamia called Iraq. The British soon realized that “The League of nations territory mandated to Great Britain to prepare a homeland for the Jewish people” was a bit too long so, as an educated Britain had studied “The classics”, they resurrected the title Palaestine as an informal name for the mandated territory. Initially, the residents carried British passports over-stamped with “Palaestine”. Very soon, the British realized that they did not want the inhabitants of the middle east to be full British citizens with all the rights that came with citizenship, so they created a separate passport labelled Palaestine, even though no such country or state had never existed, even at that moment. It was Yasir Arafat that claimed that “We are not refugees, we are Palaestinians”, who he did not realize were Greeks, and the Bedouin Arabs DNA is closely related to that of the real Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula and not to the peoples of the Levant. The Israelites can be dated as resident in the Levant from well before the earliest mention known today, the Merneptah Stele in c. 1209 BCE at which time they had long been established in the Levant. In 1822 BCE They were known to the Sumerians as Apiru or Hapiru and were nomadic raiders. Another group of Semites Canaan called Hyksos who were who were dreaded as being violent when provoked, they were the Dynastic rulers (Pharaohs) of lower (Nile Delta) Egypt 1650-1550 BC until they were expelled by Pharaoh Ahmose I.

Since the UK supported Chile and the US supported Peru this war is often considered as a proxy war between European colonialism and American imperialism. France also supported Peru since the majority of Peruvian mining industry was owned by the French, this country was the most hostile against Chile. On the other hand is the German perspective. The best example of it is the interesting message of the German ambassador to Chile, von Gülich to the Kaiser William I which explains the war of the Pacific to the German emperor: “(…) The true cause of the current war is, however, much deeper; It is the bitter envy, the living hatred that has prevailed against Chile for many years in Peru and Bolivia. Both countries, continually destroyed by revolutions and under terrible administration, envy Chile's material progress, its orderly political life, undisturbed by insurrections, its departure from the excesses between anarchy and despotism and its unimpeded ascent to a higher cultural step. (…) The great confidence that exists with the bravery of the Chilean soldier, who, without a doubt, is extraordinary (…) the Bolivian soldier is, like the Peruvian, mainly of Indian origin, very few with a mixture of European blood” (…) For the uncommitted European it is something undoubtable. All the cultured States of the world, interested in true civilization, can only wish for a definitive triumph for Chile, because it represents the interests of civilization in this war. Peru is, as far as its highest classes are concerned, sunk in corruption, which rises up against all values ​​and its total defeat gives hope of better conditions for foreigners in Peru and an improvement in the situation of the Peruvian people themselves. ”

It was left unsaid that in peace talks between Chile and Peru, on an American frigate Lackawanna. The United States was interested in taking commercial advantage of the Nitrate and Guano. America for the Americans? That is why they defended that there was no territorial cession of Peru to Chile, to pay the costs of the war.

Nice display of misinformation full of inacuracies and biased interpretation

First I've heard of it.

Bolivia 🇧🇴 was only 6 months in the war. Peru 🇵🇪 was in the war alone and Chile 🇨🇱 had the support of England 🇬🇧 in the Pacific war with arms and commands. After the war, Chile 🇨🇱 gave the control of the minerals and the railways of British Capitals. The real war was between Peru 🇵🇪 vs 🇬🇧 British Capital using Chilean army 🇨🇱. Peru 🇵🇪 was very alone in the war. USA 🇺🇸 didn't support to Peru 🇵🇪 because they knew the real enemy of Peru 🇵🇪: British Empire 🇬🇧. In those year, British Empire 🇬🇧 had wars in China 🇨🇳, India 🇮🇳, Paraguay 🇵🇾 and other parts around the war. The great question: Why didn't British Empire 🇬🇧 sell arms and warships to Peru 🇵🇪 and Chile 🇨🇱 receive all support? Remember who supported to UK 🇬🇧 in the Falkland War? Chile 🇨🇱 exists thanks to British Empire 🇬🇧 support since the beginning of the Chilean Republic.

The civil war is pretty well handeled and in the past. In america there are folks seriously saying "the south shall rise again" in finland no one wants that genocide to return. I actually live in a piece of civil war history. My house was used by the local red guard as a headquarter.

This war was as usual started by the british empire because they wanted to control the useful resource of saltpeter and guano back then but most people in these south american countries mostly denied the rol the british empire played in this war.

You only watch the Peru's side of the history and it is innacurate, and put one side as the victims and its not true.

Paraguay found no oil, but Bolivia did find in their quarter of the region.

Jews and their lies will eventually be avenged.

That's horrific. Every time I think I've seen it all, I come across even more disturbing images or stories about antisemitism in Europe

South America had few conflicts, but are very interesting, and their results had consequences that mark the region to this day. Greetings from🇨🇴👌🏼

Lieing like hell on this man. "WHAT DID I DO TO YOU?" were his last words. Tge people if his that suded with tge west, deserve the Libya they have now. No way i woukd have turned my back on him.

Ολοι οι γείτονες της Ελλάδας το μονο που κάνουν ειναι να κλέβουν την ιστορια μας !Εχουν παρει εδάφη μας και οταν έχουν την ευκαιρία θέλουν να πάρουν και αλλα !

Excelente video de un pasaje de nuestra historia.

The peruvian army was doomed from the beginning. The Chileans started arming about a decade before the conflict in line with the "DOCTRINA PORTALES", at the same time the peruvian army was is terrible shape. When war started it was clear the what the outcome would be. The enmity between both nations is because of the hatred of the chilean leadership to Peru in that war, to put that in context: even the germans were less savage when they invaded France in WWII...The question is: Why?

Hitler is finlands friend

Chile was able to win the Pacific war and was able to defeat Bolivia and Peru because of weapons assistance from Great Britain?

shave off that nasty stuff on your face

Haven't watched the video yet, but the answer is yes :)

Apparently many Dutch SS members were sent to the Indies to fight, this way they could clear their record. Perhaps some of them were a little more fanatic than the rest? Also don't forget that many KNIL soldiers were from a completely different part of the country and also a different religion so they couldn't care much about the locals.

Major Historical Inaccuracy at the Beginning! One month after the war began, Chile suffered a defeat at Iquique. This video incorrectly states it as a Chilean victory. Despite the setback, Captain Arturo Prat demonstrated immense heroism. He refused to surrender even though his two small ships were vastly outnumbered by the enemy's eight massive vessels. His bravery ignited a surge of patriotic leadership by example. This pivotal moment galvanized the entire Chilean nation. The country swiftly united and mobilized for war. The rest of the story unfolds as documented in history. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Iquique

Looks like a mix between nazi’s and Canadian Mounties.

Perú campeón is a country that knows nothing but defeat. The funny thing they say is that they have never been humiliated 😂 🤣

How dare you call him dictator 😢😢😢

sins u Mention this maybe war maybe u want to translate to English: this channel: www.youtube.com/@LaHistoriaCNTC

La quarta sponda!! 🇱🇾🇮🇹

8:45 nah as an argentine i would call thata as BS. Granted i wasn't alive back then but i just don't see (as an argentine) the common people ever backing the allies, the population is deeply anti-anglo till this very day. And of course we are not pro nazi either, that's why peronism (tercer movimiento) is a cultural identity in Argentina, because we do not fall under the category of the allies or the axis, and betwen the axis and the allies i believe we hate the allies more just because they still exist while the nazis had long gone.

I was in a band where the drummer was a descendant of germans, i didn't really pay much attention to it not even realize he had a german surname till i saw a jar he has with the german imperial eagle print on it. I saw the jar and said to him "hey that's the german imperial eagel" he answered me "well duh, my surname is Hess" and i just froze, then i asked him "wait, hess? As in Rudolph Hess, the Nazi guy?" And he quickly replied "yes I'm related to that guy but i don't stand for any of what he stood for"

Excellent episode. Very educational 👍+1.

That woman being chased by the boys is one of the most horrific things I’ve ever seen

these are so similar to hamas. I never knew nazis were this barbaric

Nice

usually chilean historiography focus on the war before the occupation of lima. since it was the war fought between regular armies and navies. the war after lima occupation is usually brushed over both by contemporary and later historians, besides the battles of concepcion and huamachuco. but its impressive to know how the chilean occupation disintegrated the thin fabric of peruvian society and basically plunged peru into chaos until the chilean army retreated.

Well done, except that the battle in Iquique, as somebody pointed before, Huáscar sent to the bottom if the sea la Esmeralda. Hours later, la Covadonga made surrender the peruvian La Unión. Interesting subject.

In the mid1960s Bolivia declared war to retake these lands; there were more admirals on the Presidential balcony that day than at any time in their past.

What in the world are you talking about in claiming that the Breast-Litovsks was harsh treatment ? Not a square meter of ethnically inhabited Russian territory was requested by the central powers ! What the Russian empire lost was its colonial additions to the Russian empire there’s nothing harsh there , Russia lost Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia none of which were territories inhabited by the Russian people ! Get your history straight if you want to call yourself a historian ‼️🇱🇹🇱🇻🇪🇪🇺🇦 it was the Versailles treaty of 1919 which was absolutely harsh and showed no respect at all for self determination by way of plebiscites. Had the infamous Versailles treaty been is just as the treaty of Brest lithovsks maybe they wouldn’t of been a World War II continuation of World War I ! And I know you know that for a fact but why you don’t want to discuss that I don’t understand 😳

Without a quickly defended border in the East how long before Germany was overrun after “ supposedly “ wars end. Fortunately the US had Harry Trueman who had spoken to officials from FDR’s day who had been aghast as to what he had caved in on…. And what he was about to following Yalta. It is lucky that Germany was not completely absorbed if it hadn’t been for Trueman and Earnest Beavan at Potsdam, that cobbled together the German Federal Republic, the disaster would have been total. Hopefully the US is mindful that having an elderly and infirm president can spell disaster.

Argentina such a legend

Dude, believe me, none of your videos are "boring", no matter the subject. Keep up the great work!

I have seen many of your videos, which I enjoy very much, but this time I must say that there are some confusions and mistakes. At the beginning of the war the Chilean army had just over 2.000 men, but had experienced officers who fought in wars against the Mapuches (that war lasted 300 years!). Chile had 2 powerful ships but Perú had one which was faster, the Huascar, and the Iquique naval combat (May 21st 1879) Chile lost one old ship, and Peru lost one of its best ships, the Independencia. Chile didn’t have dominion of the seas until the naval battle of Angamos (October 8th 1879), where Chile defeated Peru and captured Peru´s best ship, the Huascar, which was repaired and incorporated into the Chilean navy. The jump off the cliff of Colonel Alfonso Ugarte is just a myth but has no historical importance. It is important to mention that in all battles the number of soldiers fighting on each side was similar, so that no victory can be attributed to a higher number of soldiers; on the contrary, in almost all the battles the Chileans attacked, and the Peruvians / Bolivians fought in their defensive positions. The victory of Chile was due to several reasons: the organization of the war efforts, careful study and preparation of supplies, discipline and motivation of the troops (mostly volunteers), political stability (there was even a presidential election during the war).

Errr... Chilean troops didnt sack the city, PERUVIAN DESERTERS sacked the city after they ran from battle to the point British, French and US marines had to be landed to restore order, and THEN Rufino Torrico the Mayor of Lima REQUESTED that the Chilean army enter the city to prevent further mischief.